ETF Holders

NBSM vs CZA overlap

NBSM and CZA overlap 3.8% by weight, across 8 shared holdings.

NBSMCZA

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

3.8%
overlap by weight, across 8 shared holdings
NBSM14.2% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 73
CZA3.8% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 100

These funds report on different dates (NBSM: May 31, 2026, CZA: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

HoldingNBSMCZAOverlap
Lincoln ElectricLECO1.16%0.71%0.71%
Crane CoCR1.59%0.59%0.59%
Watts Water TE-aWTS1.56%0.52%0.52%
Valmont INDSVMI2.66%0.45%0.45%
Houlihan Lokey IHLI1.17%0.44%0.44%
Aptargroup Inc.ATR2.08%0.40%0.40%
Armstrong WorldAWI1.61%0.36%0.36%
Kirby Corp.KEX2.38%0.35%0.35%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: NBSM, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; CZA, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.

Who owns them: NBSM institutional holders, CZA institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do NBSM and CZA overlap?

3.8% by weight, with 8 holdings in common, using holdings for NBSM as of May 31, 2026 and CZA as of July 31, 2026. The largest shared position is LECO.

Do institutions hold both NBSM and CZA?

12 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 69 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.