ETF Holders

XMLV vs ISCV overlap

XMLV and ISCV overlap 13.1% by weight, across 68 shared holdings.

XMLVISCV

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

13.1%
overlap by weight, across 68 shared holdings
XMLV85.8% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 80
ISCV13.1% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1,049

These funds report on different dates (XMLV: May 31, 2026, ISCV: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

HoldingXMLVISCVOverlap
Reinsurance GROURGA1.03%0.48%0.48%
Crown Holdings ICCK1.05%0.42%0.42%
UNUM GroupUNM1.10%0.40%0.40%
RenaissancereRNR1.08%0.40%0.40%
Gaming and LeisuGLPI1.45%0.39%0.39%
Cullen/FrostCFR1.11%0.31%0.31%
Old Repub IntlORI1.08%0.31%0.31%
OGE Energy Corp.OGE1.68%0.31%0.31%
Southstate BankSSB1.01%0.31%0.31%
Omega HealthcareOHI1.36%0.29%0.29%
NNN REIT Inc.NNN1.60%0.29%0.29%
Prosperity BncshPB1.11%0.27%0.27%
Commerce BcshsCBSH1.22%0.26%0.26%
Lamar Advertis-aLAMR1.36%0.26%0.26%
UGI Corp.UGI1.26%0.25%0.25%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: XMLV, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; ISCV, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.

Who owns them: XMLV institutional holders, ISCV institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do XMLV and ISCV overlap?

13.1% by weight, with 68 holdings in common, using holdings for XMLV as of May 31, 2026 and ISCV as of July 31, 2026. The largest shared position is RGA.

Do institutions hold both XMLV and ISCV?

64 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 256 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.