XHS vs COMB overlap
XHS and COMB overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: XHS, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; COMB, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | XHS | COMB |
|---|---|---|
| Royal Bank of Canada | $326K | $8.5M |
| LPL Financial LLC | $7.1M | $509K |
| Morgan Stanley | $4.1M | $52 |
| Stifel Financial Corp. | $1.4M | $1.0M |
| Wells Fargo & Company | $2.2M | $11 |
| IFP Advisors, Inc | $5K | $432K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $216K | $107K |
| Arax Advisory Partners | $37K | $1K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: XHS institutional holders, COMB institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do XHS and COMB overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for XHS as of June 30, 2026 and COMB as of June 30, 2026.
Do institutions hold both XHS and COMB?
8 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 99 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.