VGMS vs METV overlap
VGMS and METV overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: VGMS, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; METV, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | VGMS | METV |
|---|---|---|
| Royal Bank of Canada | $1.9M | $81K |
| Commonwealth Equity Services, LLC | $611K | $376K |
| Morgan Stanley | $21K | $942K |
| Farther Finance Advisors, LLC | $155K | $18K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $88K | $19K |
| Wells Fargo & Company | $1 | $44K |
| AE Wealth Management LLC | $17K | $24K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: VGMS institutional holders, METV institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do VGMS and METV overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for VGMS as of June 30, 2026 and METV as of June 30, 2026.
Do institutions hold both VGMS and METV?
7 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 106 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.