UTSL vs CRWL overlap

UTSL and CRWL overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

UTSLCRWL

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

UTSL0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 31

CRWL0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: UTSL, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026; CRWL, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 18 holding any

UTSL41.2% of its 13F dollars, 33.3% of its 9 holders

CRWL44.9% of its 13F dollars, 25.0% of its 12 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	UTSL	CRWL
Goldman Sachs Group Inc.	$2.1M	$1.7M
GTS Securities LLC	$429K	$1.0M
Simplex Trading, LLC	$17K	$59K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: UTSL institutional holders, CRWL institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do UTSL and CRWL overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for UTSL as of July 31, 2026 and CRWL as of June 30, 2026.

Do institutions hold both UTSL and CRWL?

3 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 18 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.