USCL vs CGNG overlap
USCL and CGNG overlap 10.2% by weight, across 19 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
| Holding | USCL | CGNG | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc.AVGO | 5.94% | 2.14% | 2.14% |
| Nvidia Corp.NVDA | 5.92% | 1.50% | 1.50% |
| Microsoft Corp.MSFT | 4.79% | 1.30% | 1.30% |
| Alphabet Inc.-aGOOGL | 3.20% | 1.25% | 1.25% |
| META Platforms-aMETA | 3.32% | 0.97% | 0.97% |
| Alphabet Inc.-CGOOG | 2.65% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
| Mastercard Inc.-aMA | 1.01% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Cloudflare Inc.-aNET | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.23% |
| ELI Lilly & CoLLY | 2.14% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
| SLB Ltd.SLB | 0.20% | 0.22% | 0.20% |
| Thermo FisherTMO | 0.44% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
| Mercadolibre Inc.MELI | 0.18% | 1.32% | 0.18% |
| VISA Inc.-Class aV | 1.32% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| AON PLC-Class aAON | 0.15% | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Royal CaribbeanRCL | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: USCL, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; CGNG, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | USCL | CGNG |
|---|---|---|
| Royal Bank of Canada | $46K | $28.1M |
| UBS Group AG | $250 | $25.1M |
| Susquehanna International Group, LLP | $982K | $4.5M |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc. | $2.1M | $774K |
| US Bancorp | $3K | $14K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: USCL institutional holders, CGNG institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do USCL and CGNG overlap?
10.2% by weight, with 19 holdings in common, using holdings for USCL as of May 31, 2026 and CGNG as of May 31, 2026. The largest shared position is AVGO.
Do institutions hold both USCL and CGNG?
5 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 249 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.