SQLV vs FEMG overlap

SQLV and FEMG overlap 0.5% by weight, across 1 shared holdings.

SQLVFEMG

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.5%

overlap by weight, across 1 shared holdings

SQLV0.5% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 319

FEMG0.6% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 150

Top shared holdings

Holding	SQLV	FEMG	Overlap
LYFT Inc.-aLYFT	0.53%	0.55%	0.53%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: SQLV, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; FEMG, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 19 holding any

SQLV8.3% of its 13F dollars, 5.9% of its 17 holders

FEMG14.4% of its 13F dollars, 33.3% of its 3 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	SQLV	FEMG
Citadel Advisors LLC	$482K	$856K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: SQLV institutional holders, FEMG institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do SQLV and FEMG overlap?

0.5% by weight, with 1 holdings in common, using holdings for SQLV as of June 30, 2026 and FEMG as of June 30, 2026. The largest shared position is LYFT.

Do institutions hold both SQLV and FEMG?

1 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 19 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.