SQLT vs SAWS overlap
SQLT and SAWS overlap 7.8% by weight, across 33 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
These funds report on different dates (SQLT: May 31, 2026, SAWS: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.
Top shared holdings
| Holding | SQLT | SAWS | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sterling InfrastSTRL | 1.02% | 1.24% | 1.02% |
| Sanmina Corp.SANM | 0.63% | 2.28% | 0.63% |
| Mueller INDSMLI | 0.59% | 2.39% | 0.59% |
| Applied INDU TECAIT | 0.50% | 1.57% | 0.50% |
| ADV Energy INDSAEIS | 0.46% | 2.03% | 0.46% |
| Cirrus Logic Inc.CRUS | 0.45% | 1.05% | 0.45% |
| Ensign Group Inc.ENSG | 0.39% | 0.74% | 0.39% |
| EnersysENS | 0.34% | 0.89% | 0.34% |
| ESCO Tech Inc.ESE | 0.29% | 1.93% | 0.29% |
| MYR Group Inc./deMYRG | 0.28% | 1.53% | 0.28% |
| Krystal BiotechKRYS | 0.28% | 1.89% | 0.28% |
| TG TherapeuticsTGTX | 0.24% | 0.44% | 0.24% |
| Pricesmart Inc.PSMT | 0.22% | 3.34% | 0.22% |
| Clear Secure I-aYOU | 0.21% | 0.91% | 0.21% |
| ACM Research-aACMR | 0.19% | 0.74% | 0.19% |
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: SQLT, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; SAWS, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
No 13F filer reports holding both.
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: SQLT institutional holders, SAWS institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do SQLT and SAWS overlap?
7.8% by weight, with 33 holdings in common, using holdings for SQLT as of May 31, 2026 and SAWS as of July 31, 2026. The largest shared position is STRL.
Do institutions hold both SQLT and SAWS?
0 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 7 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.