ETF Holders

SPVM vs CGGG overlap

SPVM and CGGG overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

SPVMCGGG

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%
overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings
SPVM0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 100
CGGG0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 40

These funds report on different dates (SPVM: July 31, 2026, CGGG: May 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: SPVM, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026; CGGG, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026.

Who owns them: SPVM institutional holders, CGGG institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do SPVM and CGGG overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for SPVM as of July 31, 2026 and CGGG as of May 31, 2026.

Do institutions hold both SPVM and CGGG?

6 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 65 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.