ETF Holders

SPEM vs SCZ overlap

SPEM and SCZ overlap 0.1% by weight, across 13 shared holdings.

SPEMSCZ

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.1%
overlap by weight, across 13 shared holdings
SPEM0.1% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 2,902
SCZ0.4% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 2,054

Top shared holdings

HoldingSPEMSCZOverlap
Xinyi Glass8680.04%0.05%0.04%
Metlen Energy &MTLN0.04%0.15%0.04%
Time Interconnec17290.01%0.03%0.01%
HBM Holdings Ltd.21420.01%0.03%0.01%
Citic Telecom18830.01%0.02%0.01%
Mobvista Inc.18600.01%0.02%0.01%
OSL Group Ltd.8630.00%0.03%0.00%
Riverstone HldgsRSTON0.00%0.01%0.00%
Guotai Junan17880.00%0.02%0.00%
Laekna Inc.0.00%0.00%0.00%
United Energy GP4670.00%0.02%0.00%
JS Global Lifest16910.00%0.01%0.00%
The United Labor39330.00%0.03%0.00%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: SPEM, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; SCZ, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.

Who owns them: SPEM institutional holders, SCZ institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do SPEM and SCZ overlap?

0.1% by weight, with 13 holdings in common, using holdings for SPEM as of June 30, 2026 and SCZ as of July 31, 2026. The largest shared position is 868.

Do institutions hold both SPEM and SCZ?

374 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 1,425 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.