SIXS vs RFV overlap

SIXS and RFV overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

SIXSRFV

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

SIXS0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 83

RFV0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 96

These funds report on different dates (SIXS: May 31, 2026, RFV: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: SIXS, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; RFV, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 99 holding any

SIXS0.7% of its 13F dollars, 62.5% of its 8 holders

RFV20.4% of its 13F dollars, 5.2% of its 96 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	SIXS	RFV
Morgan Stanley	$64	$26.3M
Advisory Services Network, LLC	$204K	$1.4M
Two Sigma Investments, LP	$373K	$629K
UBS Group AG	$27K	$850K
JPMorgan Chase & Co	$303K	$22K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: SIXS institutional holders, RFV institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do SIXS and RFV overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for SIXS as of May 31, 2026 and RFV as of July 31, 2026.

Do institutions hold both SIXS and RFV?

5 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 99 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.