ETF Holders

SHYG vs JMUB overlap

SHYG and JMUB overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

SHYGJMUB

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%
overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings
SHYG0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1,153
JMUB0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1,884

These funds report on different dates (SHYG: July 31, 2026, JMUB: May 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: SHYG, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026; JMUB, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026.

Who owns them: SHYG institutional holders, JMUB institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do SHYG and JMUB overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for SHYG as of July 31, 2026 and JMUB as of May 31, 2026.

Do institutions hold both SHYG and JMUB?

174 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 911 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.