ETF Holders

SHM vs CMF overlap

SHM and CMF overlap 1.8% by weight, across 24 shared holdings.

SHMCMF

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

1.8%
overlap by weight, across 24 shared holdings
SHM3.4% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1,043
CMF1.9% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1,607

Top shared holdings

HoldingSHMCMFOverlap
E Co AWP JT PWRS-a-1EAWWTR0.32%0.33%0.32%
San Francisco PUB-a0.21%0.25%0.21%
CA Regents UNIV-CD0.16%0.22%0.16%
Regents of UNIV CA-BZ0.16%0.12%0.12%
Los Angeles DEPT-C0.15%0.12%0.12%
California St-REF-a0.17%0.09%0.09%
La Cmnty CLG-D0.25%0.09%0.09%
CA St WTR-BG0.08%0.12%0.08%
Los Angeles CA UN-QRR0.21%0.07%0.07%
Desert Sands CA UNIF SCH DIST0.13%0.06%0.06%
California St0.08%0.06%0.06%
Bay Area TOLL-F-10.14%0.05%0.05%
UN San DIST FING-a0.20%0.05%0.05%
Los Angeles-E-REF0.05%0.06%0.05%
Los Angeles Cmnty CLG0.30%0.04%0.04%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: SHM, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; CMF, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026.

Who owns them: SHM institutional holders, CMF institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do SHM and CMF overlap?

1.8% by weight, with 24 holdings in common, using holdings for SHM as of June 30, 2026 and CMF as of May 31, 2026. The largest shared position is EAWWTR.

Do institutions hold both SHM and CMF?

133 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 617 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.