SFGV vs PCY overlap
SFGV and PCY overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
These funds report on different dates (SFGV: May 29, 2026, PCY: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: SFGV, SEC Form N-PORT, May 29, 2026; PCY, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | SFGV | PCY |
|---|---|---|
| Sequoia Financial Advisors, LLC | $1.1B | $348K |
| UBS Group AG | $3K | $116.7M |
| BlackRock, Inc. | $1.1M | $7.3M |
| Cerity Partners LLC | $6.6M | $1.3M |
| Susquehanna International Group, LLP | $255K | $3.7M |
| Royal Bank of Canada | $164K | $2.3M |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $321K | $1.9M |
| Mercer Global Advisors Inc. | $1.4M | $200K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: SFGV institutional holders, PCY institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do SFGV and PCY overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for SFGV as of May 29, 2026 and PCY as of July 31, 2026.
Do institutions hold both SFGV and PCY?
8 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 190 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.