SFGV vs ICLN overlap
SFGV and ICLN overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
These funds report on different dates (SFGV: May 29, 2026, ICLN: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: SFGV, SEC Form N-PORT, May 29, 2026; ICLN, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | SFGV | ICLN |
|---|---|---|
| Susquehanna International Group, LLP | $255K | $59.9M |
| UBS Group AG | $3K | $23.8M |
| Royal Bank of Canada | $164K | $14.4M |
| Cerity Partners LLC | $6.6M | $994K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $321K | $3.4M |
| Forum Finance Group S.A. | $2.3M | $157K |
| Mercer Global Advisors Inc. | $1.4M | $479K |
| Mariner, LLC | $569K | $634K |
| BlackRock, Inc. | $1.1M | $46K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: SFGV institutional holders, ICLN institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do SFGV and ICLN overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for SFGV as of May 29, 2026 and ICLN as of July 31, 2026.
Do institutions hold both SFGV and ICLN?
9 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 473 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.