SECT vs KLMN overlap
3 institutions report holding both SECT and KLMN.
SECTKLMN
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
We don’t have holdings for KLMN. Most funds that aren’t in the SEC’s N-PORT data are unit trusts, grantor trusts or very new funds. The institutions tab may still have them.
3
institutions report holding both, of 129 holding any
SECT0.1% of its 13F dollars, 2.4% of its 127 holders
KLMN0.2% of its 13F dollars, 60.0% of its 5 holders
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | SECT | KLMN |
|---|---|---|
| Susquehanna International Group, LLP | $2.3M | $1.9M |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc. | $231K | $2.7M |
| Flow Traders U.S. LLC | $394K | $446K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: SECT institutional holders, KLMN institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
Do institutions hold both SECT and KLMN?
3 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 129 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.