RWM vs PABD overlap

RWM and PABD overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

RWMPABD

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

RWM0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1

PABD0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 424

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: RWM, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; PABD, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 42 holding any

RWM13.2% of its 13F dollars, 13.2% of its 38 holders

PABD11.2% of its 13F dollars, 55.6% of its 9 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	RWM	PABD
Morgan Stanley	$4.1M	$4K
Flow Traders U.S. LLC	$170K	$2.6M
Jane Street Group, LLC	$457K	$1.4M
UBS Group AG	$47K	$53K
JPMorgan Chase & Co	$35K	$3K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: RWM institutional holders, PABD institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do RWM and PABD overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for RWM as of May 31, 2026 and PABD as of May 31, 2026.

Do institutions hold both RWM and PABD?

5 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 42 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.