RVNU vs MMCA overlap
RVNU and MMCA overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
These funds report on different dates (RVNU: May 29, 2026, MMCA: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: RVNU, SEC Form N-PORT, May 29, 2026; MMCA, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | RVNU | MMCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cetera Investment Advisers | $2.4M | $3.4M |
| Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc. | $478K | $3.7M |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $431K | $465K |
| Jane Street Group, LLC | $395K | $359K |
| Wells Fargo & Company | $232K | $9 |
| Rockefeller Capital Management L.P. | $5K | $71K |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | $35K | $12K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: RVNU institutional holders, MMCA institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do RVNU and MMCA overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for RVNU as of May 29, 2026 and MMCA as of July 31, 2026.
Do institutions hold both RVNU and MMCA?
7 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 83 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.