RSMV vs MCHS overlap
RSMV and MCHS overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: RSMV, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; MCHS, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
No 13F filer reports holding both.
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: RSMV institutional holders, MCHS institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do RSMV and MCHS overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for RSMV as of June 30, 2026 and MCHS as of June 30, 2026.
Do institutions hold both RSMV and MCHS?
0 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 11 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.