RMCA vs INVG overlap

RMCA and INVG overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

RMCAINVG

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

RMCA0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 87

INVG0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 130

These funds report on different dates (RMCA: July 31, 2026, INVG: May 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: RMCA, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026; INVG, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 9 holding any

RMCA4.5% of its 13F dollars, 25.0% of its 4 holders

INVG1.7% of its 13F dollars, 16.7% of its 6 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	RMCA	INVG
Jane Street Group, LLC	$1.1M	$391K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: RMCA institutional holders, INVG institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do RMCA and INVG overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for RMCA as of July 31, 2026 and INVG as of May 31, 2026.

Do institutions hold both RMCA and INVG?

1 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 9 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.