RETL vs CRWL overlap

RETL and CRWL overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

RETLCRWL

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

RETL0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 75

CRWL0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: RETL, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026; CRWL, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 17 holding any

RETL76.2% of its 13F dollars, 44.4% of its 9 holders

CRWL76.1% of its 13F dollars, 33.3% of its 12 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	RETL	CRWL
Susquehanna International Group, LLP	$2.8M	$1.1M
Goldman Sachs Group Inc.	$700K	$1.7M
GTS Securities LLC	$977K	$1.0M
Jane Street Group, LLC	$175K	$934K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: RETL institutional holders, CRWL institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do RETL and CRWL overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for RETL as of July 31, 2026 and CRWL as of June 30, 2026.

Do institutions hold both RETL and CRWL?

4 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 17 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.