QTUM vs EAGL overlap
QTUM and EAGL overlap 5.6% by weight, across 5 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
| Holding | QTUM | EAGL | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semic-ADRTSM | 1.24% | 6.64% | 1.24% |
| ASML Holding-NYASML | 1.22% | 1.85% | 1.22% |
| Alphabet Inc.-aGOOGL | 1.07% | 4.70% | 1.07% |
| Amazon.COM Inc.AMZN | 1.06% | 7.64% | 1.06% |
| Microsoft Corp.MSFT | 1.00% | 3.88% | 1.00% |
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: QTUM, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; EAGL, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | QTUM | EAGL |
|---|---|---|
| LPL Financial LLC | $228.7M | $246K |
| Bank of America Corp. | $133.9M | $15.7M |
| Cresset Asset Management, LLC | $784K | $121.9M |
| Raymond James Financial Inc. | $55.1M | $3.1M |
| Royal Bank of Canada | $51.9M | $2.0M |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $46.3M | $22K |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | $100K | $45.6M |
| Morgan Stanley | $5.4M | $39.7M |
| Stifel Financial Corp. | $23.0M | $7.9M |
| Citadel Advisors LLC | $13.0M | $14.9M |
| UBS Group AG | $7.0M | $18.6M |
| HighTower Advisors, LLC | $15.3M | $5.6M |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc. | $13.9M | $2.7M |
| Rockefeller Capital Management L.P. | $14.8M | $1.1M |
| Susquehanna International Group, LLP | $15.2M | $453K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: QTUM institutional holders, EAGL institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do QTUM and EAGL overlap?
5.6% by weight, with 5 holdings in common, using holdings for QTUM as of June 30, 2026 and EAGL as of June 30, 2026. The largest shared position is TSM.
Do institutions hold both QTUM and EAGL?
28 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 607 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.