QSIG vs CSSD overlap

QSIG and CSSD overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

QSIGCSSD

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

QSIG0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 610

CSSD0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 159

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: QSIG, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; CSSD, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 37 holding any

QSIG6.5% of its 13F dollars, 11.1% of its 27 holders

CSSD3.4% of its 13F dollars, 23.1% of its 13 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	QSIG	CSSD
Jane Street Group, LLC	$1.3M	$734K
Osaic Holdings, Inc.	$1.3M	$213K
RFG Advisory, LLC	$304K	$589K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: QSIG institutional holders, CSSD institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do QSIG and CSSD overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for QSIG as of June 30, 2026 and CSSD as of June 30, 2026.

Do institutions hold both QSIG and CSSD?

3 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 37 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.