QQQA vs EMM overlap
QQQA and EMM overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: QQQA, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; EMM, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | QQQA | EMM |
|---|---|---|
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $2.4M | $90K |
| Citadel Advisors LLC | $534K | $623K |
| Cetera Investment Advisers | $458K | $337K |
| Morgan Stanley | $9K | $226K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: QQQA institutional holders, EMM institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do QQQA and EMM overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for QQQA as of May 31, 2026 and EMM as of May 31, 2026.
Do institutions hold both QQQA and EMM?
4 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 35 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.