QLVE vs MCH overlap

QLVE and MCH overlap 3.4% by weight, across 3 shared holdings.

QLVEMCH

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

3.4%

overlap by weight, across 3 shared holdings

QLVE3.4% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 132

MCH15.2% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 55

Top shared holdings

Holding	QLVE	MCH	Overlap
Tencent700	2.52%	12.05%	2.52%
CCB-H939	0.73%	1.72%	0.73%
PDD Holdings Inc.PDD	0.16%	1.41%	0.16%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: QLVE, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026; MCH, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 22 holding any

QLVE33.7% of its 13F dollars, 28.6% of its 7 holders

MCH30.7% of its 13F dollars, 11.8% of its 17 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	QLVE	MCH
Old Mission Capital LLC	$2.9M	$3.8M
Susquehanna International Group, LLP	$2.0M	$756K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: QLVE institutional holders, MCH institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do QLVE and MCH overlap?

3.4% by weight, with 3 holdings in common, using holdings for QLVE as of July 31, 2026 and MCH as of June 30, 2026. The largest shared position is 700.

Do institutions hold both QLVE and MCH?

2 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 22 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.