ETF Holders

QLC vs JHML overlap

QLC and JHML overlap 49.3% by weight, across 173 shared holdings.

QLCJHML

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

49.3%
overlap by weight, across 173 shared holdings
QLC98.7% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 177
JHML54.1% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 780

Top shared holdings

HoldingQLCJHMLOverlap
Nvidia Corp.NVDA7.10%4.02%4.02%
Apple Inc.AAPL7.33%3.99%3.99%
Alphabet Inc.-aGOOGL4.09%2.65%2.65%
Amazon.COM Inc.AMZN2.59%2.74%2.59%
Microsoft Corp.MSFT4.25%2.51%2.51%
Broadcom Inc.AVGO2.94%1.75%1.75%
META Platforms-aMETA1.40%1.57%1.40%
JPMorgan ChaseJPM1.98%1.13%1.13%
Micron TechMU1.09%1.62%1.09%
ELI Lilly & CoLLY1.12%1.09%1.09%
Berkshire HATH-BBRK/B1.27%0.89%0.89%
Alphabet Inc.-CGOOG3.66%0.84%0.84%
LAM ResearchLRCX0.80%0.76%0.76%
Applied MaterialAMAT1.14%0.73%0.73%
Johnson&JohnsonJNJ1.81%0.72%0.72%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: QLC, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026; JHML, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

Who owns them: QLC institutional holders, JHML institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do QLC and JHML overlap?

49.3% by weight, with 173 holdings in common, using holdings for QLC as of July 31, 2026 and JHML as of June 30, 2026. The largest shared position is NVDA.

Do institutions hold both QLC and JHML?

27 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 153 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.