ETF Holders

QGRO vs NULV overlap

QGRO and NULV overlap 6.1% by weight, across 24 shared holdings.

QGRONULV

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

6.1%
overlap by weight, across 24 shared holdings
QGRO6.1% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 189
NULV37.5% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 101

These funds report on different dates (QGRO: May 31, 2026, NULV: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

HoldingQGRONULVOverlap
Salesforce Inc.CRM1.20%1.29%1.20%
META Platforms-aMETA1.12%3.55%1.12%
Accenture PLC-aACN0.87%1.01%0.87%
Analog DevicesADI0.27%1.41%0.27%
Microsoft Corp.MSFT0.27%8.74%0.27%
Parker HannifinPH0.19%1.55%0.19%
CBOE Global MarkCBOE0.18%1.00%0.18%
Baker Hughes CoBKR0.16%1.28%0.16%
CH RobinsonCHRW0.14%0.50%0.14%
Johnson ControlsJCI0.14%0.70%0.14%
CONS Edison Inc.ED0.14%1.23%0.14%
Netapp Inc.NTAP0.14%1.08%0.14%
American ExpressAXP0.14%1.49%0.14%
Cardinal HealthCAH0.13%1.53%0.13%
Ecolab Inc.ECL0.13%1.08%0.13%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: QGRO, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; NULV, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.

Who owns them: QGRO institutional holders, NULV institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do QGRO and NULV overlap?

6.1% by weight, with 24 holdings in common, using holdings for QGRO as of May 31, 2026 and NULV as of July 31, 2026. The largest shared position is CRM.

Do institutions hold both QGRO and NULV?

62 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 399 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.