QAT vs EPRF overlap
5 institutions report holding both QAT and EPRF.
QATEPRF
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
We don’t have holdings for EPRF. Most funds that aren’t in the SEC’s N-PORT data are unit trusts, grantor trusts or very new funds. The institutions tab may still have them.
5
institutions report holding both, of 51 holding any
QAT19.4% of its 13F dollars, 16.7% of its 30 holders
EPRF63.8% of its 13F dollars, 19.2% of its 26 holders
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | QAT | EPRF |
|---|---|---|
| Royal Bank of Canada | $43K | $16.0M |
| Susquehanna International Group, LLP | $3.0M | $570K |
| Jane Street Group, LLC | $2.0M | $175K |
| Morgan Stanley | $148K | $61K |
| Wells Fargo & Company | $10 | $13 |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: QAT institutional holders, EPRF institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
Do institutions hold both QAT and EPRF?
5 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 51 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.