ETF Holders

PZA vs CGMS overlap

PZA and CGMS overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

PZACGMS

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%
overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings
PZA0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 6,664
CGMS0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1,460

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: PZA, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; CGMS, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

Who owns them: PZA institutional holders, CGMS institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do PZA and CGMS overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for PZA as of May 31, 2026 and CGMS as of June 30, 2026.

Do institutions hold both PZA and CGMS?

132 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 550 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.