PRVS vs FSGS overlap

PRVS and FSGS overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

PRVSFSGS

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

PRVS0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 27

FSGS0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 100

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: PRVS, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; FSGS, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 26 holding any

PRVS1.2% of its 13F dollars, 13.3% of its 15 holders

FSGS0.6% of its 13F dollars, 15.4% of its 13 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	PRVS	FSGS
Osaic Holdings, Inc.	$70K	$61K
Harbour Investments, Inc.	$70K	$7K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: PRVS institutional holders, FSGS institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do PRVS and FSGS overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for PRVS as of June 30, 2026 and FSGS as of June 30, 2026.

Do institutions hold both PRVS and FSGS?

2 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 26 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.