ETF Holders

PIEQ vs CGIC overlap

PIEQ and CGIC overlap 20.5% by weight, across 14 shared holdings.

PIEQCGIC

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

20.5%
overlap by weight, across 14 shared holdings
PIEQ44.7% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 35
CGIC20.5% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 192

Top shared holdings

HoldingPIEQCGICOverlap
Taiwan Semic-ADRTSM6.96%5.83%5.83%
ASML Holding NVASML6.80%2.74%2.74%
Samsung Electron0059308.00%2.46%2.46%
Astrazeneca PLCAZN3.05%1.83%1.83%
BAE Systems PLCBAESF2.55%1.71%1.71%
Unicredit SpaUCG2.23%1.39%1.39%
BRIT AMER TobaccBATS3.97%1.25%1.25%
AIA12992.45%0.92%0.92%
BNP ParibasBNP2.10%0.68%0.68%
VALE SA Sponsored ADSVALE1.70%0.66%0.66%
Shell PLCSHELL1.33%0.47%0.47%
Komatsu Ltd.63011.35%0.26%0.26%
Entain PLCENT1.74%0.18%0.18%
GaztransportGTT0.48%0.13%0.13%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: PIEQ, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; CGIC, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026.

Who owns them: PIEQ institutional holders, CGIC institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do PIEQ and CGIC overlap?

20.5% by weight, with 14 holdings in common, using holdings for PIEQ as of June 30, 2026 and CGIC as of May 31, 2026. The largest shared position is TSM.

Do institutions hold both PIEQ and CGIC?

17 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 230 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.