OAEM vs EMKT overlap

OAEM and EMKT overlap 11.5% by weight, across 4 shared holdings.

OAEMEMKT

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

11.5%

overlap by weight, across 4 shared holdings

OAEM19.2% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 46

EMKT11.5% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 73

Top shared holdings

Holding	OAEM	EMKT	Overlap
TSMC2330	13.26%	8.87%	8.87%
Accton Tech2345	3.17%	1.00%	1.00%
Credicorp Ltd.BAP	1.17%	0.91%	0.91%
Intl Contain TERICT	1.60%	0.76%	0.76%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: OAEM, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; EMKT, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 50 holding any

OAEM5.3% of its 13F dollars, 19.4% of its 31 holders

EMKT6.2% of its 13F dollars, 24.0% of its 25 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	OAEM	EMKT
Jane Street Group, LLC	$2.9M	$1.1M
Old Mission Capital LLC	$2.2M	$709K
Susquehanna International Group, LLP	$464K	$2.3M
Aptus Capital Advisors, LLC	$25K	$2.0M
Citadel Advisors LLC	$414K	$653K
Fifth Third Bancorp	$17K	$273K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: OAEM institutional holders, EMKT institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do OAEM and EMKT overlap?

11.5% by weight, with 4 holdings in common, using holdings for OAEM as of May 31, 2026 and EMKT as of June 30, 2026. The largest shared position is 2330.

Do institutions hold both OAEM and EMKT?

6 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 50 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.