MYCN vs IBGC overlap

MYCN and IBGC overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

MYCNIBGC

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

MYCN0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 116

IBGC0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 6

These funds report on different dates (MYCN: May 31, 2026, IBGC: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: MYCN, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; IBGC, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 9 holding any

MYCN7.9% of its 13F dollars, 16.7% of its 6 holders

IBGC9.5% of its 13F dollars, 25.0% of its 4 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	MYCN	IBGC
Jane Street Group, LLC	$595K	$728K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: MYCN institutional holders, IBGC institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do MYCN and IBGC overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for MYCN as of May 31, 2026 and IBGC as of July 31, 2026.

Do institutions hold both MYCN and IBGC?

1 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 9 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.