MSTQ vs FLJH overlap

MSTQ and FLJH overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

MSTQFLJH

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

MSTQ0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 3

FLJH0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 475

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: MSTQ, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; FLJH, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 27 holding any

MSTQ1.7% of its 13F dollars, 25.0% of its 4 holders

FLJH6.9% of its 13F dollars, 4.2% of its 24 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	MSTQ	FLJH
Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc.	$526K	$2.2M

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: MSTQ institutional holders, FLJH institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do MSTQ and FLJH overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for MSTQ as of June 30, 2026 and FLJH as of June 30, 2026.

Do institutions hold both MSTQ and FLJH?

1 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 27 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.