MMCA vs BKHY overlap
MMCA and BKHY overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: MMCA, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026; BKHY, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | MMCA | BKHY |
|---|---|---|
| Cetera Investment Advisers | $3.4M | $2.8M |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | $12K | $4.8M |
| Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc. | $3.7M | $632K |
| Jane Street Group, LLC | $359K | $1.0M |
| Rockefeller Capital Management L.P. | $71K | $676K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $465K | $6K |
| Wells Fargo & Company | $9 | $15 |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: MMCA institutional holders, BKHY institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do MMCA and BKHY overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for MMCA as of July 31, 2026 and BKHY as of July 31, 2026.
Do institutions hold both MMCA and BKHY?
7 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 61 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.