MKOR vs BRF overlap
MKOR and BRF overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: MKOR, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; BRF, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | MKOR | BRF |
|---|---|---|
| Old Mission Capital LLC | $6.0M | $659K |
| Susquehanna International Group, LLP | $791K | $1.0M |
| Citadel Advisors LLC | $251K | $483K |
| Morgan Stanley | $114K | $13K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $8K | $15K |
| Simplex Trading, LLC | $397 | $3K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: MKOR institutional holders, BRF institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do MKOR and BRF overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for MKOR as of June 30, 2026 and BRF as of June 30, 2026.
Do institutions hold both MKOR and BRF?
6 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 26 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.