MFUT vs LENS overlap
MFUT and LENS overlap 5.4% by weight, across 5 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
| Holding | MFUT | LENS | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHP Group LtdBHP | 1.31% | 2.02% | 1.31% |
| Newmont Corp.NEM | 1.25% | 1.47% | 1.25% |
| VALE SA Sponsored ADSVALE | 1.20% | 2.01% | 1.20% |
| Chevron Corp.CVX | 0.92% | 4.13% | 0.92% |
| Cheniere EnergyLNG | 0.68% | 1.68% | 0.68% |
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: MFUT, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; LENS, SEC Form N-PORT, May 29, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | MFUT | LENS |
|---|---|---|
| Susquehanna International Group, LLP | $1.2M | $348K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: MFUT institutional holders, LENS institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do MFUT and LENS overlap?
5.4% by weight, with 5 holdings in common, using holdings for MFUT as of June 30, 2026 and LENS as of May 29, 2026. The largest shared position is BHP.
Do institutions hold both MFUT and LENS?
1 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 26 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.