LRNZ vs EART overlap
LRNZ and EART overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: LRNZ, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; EART, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | LRNZ | EART |
|---|---|---|
| Susquehanna International Group, LLP | $534K | $918K |
| Cetera Investment Advisers | $535K | $545K |
| Continuum Advisory, LLC | $291K | $55K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $273K | $37K |
| AE Wealth Management LLC | $201K | $12K |
| Morgan Stanley | $32K | $29K |
| Harbour Investments, Inc. | $13K | $11K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: LRNZ institutional holders, EART institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do LRNZ and EART overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for LRNZ as of June 30, 2026 and EART as of July 31, 2026.
Do institutions hold both LRNZ and EART?
7 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 48 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.