LQDB vs HIGH overlap
LQDB and HIGH overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: LQDB, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; HIGH, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | LQDB | HIGH |
|---|---|---|
| BlackRock, Inc. | $20.8M | $23K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $10K | $2.5M |
| Morgan Stanley | $499K | $36 |
| Royal Bank of Canada | $473K | $14K |
| Harbour Investments, Inc. | $85K | $11K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: LQDB institutional holders, HIGH institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do LQDB and HIGH overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for LQDB as of May 31, 2026 and HIGH as of June 30, 2026.
Do institutions hold both LQDB and HIGH?
5 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 49 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.