KMID vs FLQS overlap
KMID and FLQS overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: KMID, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026; FLQS, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | KMID | FLQS |
|---|---|---|
| LPL Financial LLC | $5.3M | $17.6M |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $30K | $2.9M |
| Citadel Advisors LLC | $495K | $2.2M |
| Susquehanna International Group, LLP | $246K | $1.8M |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | $15K | $813K |
| UBS Group AG | $20K | $92K |
| Steward Partners Investment Advisory, LLC | $43K | $10K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: KMID institutional holders, FLQS institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do KMID and FLQS overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for KMID as of July 31, 2026 and FLQS as of June 30, 2026.
Do institutions hold both KMID and FLQS?
7 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 37 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.