JAPN vs CUT overlap
JAPN and CUT overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: JAPN, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; CUT, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | JAPN | CUT |
|---|---|---|
| Citadel Advisors LLC | $446K | $1.5M |
| Jane Street Group, LLC | $368K | $226K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $23K | $25K |
| Steward Partners Investment Advisory, LLC | $30K | $12K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: JAPN institutional holders, CUT institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do JAPN and CUT overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for JAPN as of June 30, 2026 and CUT as of July 31, 2026.
Do institutions hold both JAPN and CUT?
4 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 38 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.