IXG vs GRIN overlap
IXG and GRIN overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: IXG, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; GRIN, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | IXG | GRIN |
|---|---|---|
| Raymond James Financial Inc. | $2.4M | $2.2M |
| Citadel Advisors LLC | $3.8M | $642K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $3.0M | $6K |
| Jane Street Group, LLC | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| UBS Group AG | $1.5M | $945 |
| Assetmark, Inc. | $47K | $11K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: IXG institutional holders, GRIN institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do IXG and GRIN overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for IXG as of June 30, 2026 and GRIN as of June 30, 2026.
Do institutions hold both IXG and GRIN?
6 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 130 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.