ETF Holders

IPAC vs CGIE overlap

IPAC and CGIE overlap 16.5% by weight, across 21 shared holdings.

IPACCGIE

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

16.5%
overlap by weight, across 21 shared holdings
IPAC17.4% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 1,370
CGIE23.3% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 73

These funds report on different dates (IPAC: July 31, 2026, CGIE: May 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

HoldingIPACCGIEOverlap
Tokyo Electron80351.62%1.62%1.62%
Hitachi Ltd.65011.57%1.36%1.36%
DBS Group HldgsDBS1.29%1.41%1.29%
AIA12991.15%1.28%1.15%
Recruit Holdings60981.13%1.24%1.13%
SONY Group Corp.67581.48%1.05%1.05%
Keyence Corp.68611.03%1.14%1.03%
Mitsubishi Corp.80580.98%1.64%0.98%
Tokio Marine HD87660.99%0.88%0.88%
Itochu Corp.80010.76%1.02%0.76%
Mitsub ELEC Corp.65030.74%0.79%0.74%
SHIN-ETSU CHEM40630.64%0.77%0.64%
HOYA Corp.77410.56%0.88%0.56%
HKEX3880.55%1.63%0.55%
Marubeni Corp.80020.50%1.35%0.50%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: IPAC, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026; CGIE, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026.

Who owns them: IPAC institutional holders, CGIE institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do IPAC and CGIE overlap?

16.5% by weight, with 21 holdings in common, using holdings for IPAC as of July 31, 2026 and CGIE as of May 31, 2026. The largest shared position is 8035.

Do institutions hold both IPAC and CGIE?

48 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 319 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.