IBAT vs FCLD overlap
IBAT and FCLD overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: IBAT, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026; FCLD, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | IBAT | FCLD |
|---|---|---|
| TD Waterhouse Canada Inc. | $4.2M | $97K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $11K | $1.7M |
| Citadel Advisors LLC | $816K | $742K |
| Morgan Stanley | $574K | $13K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: IBAT institutional holders, FCLD institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do IBAT and FCLD overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for IBAT as of July 31, 2026 and FCLD as of June 30, 2026.
Do institutions hold both IBAT and FCLD?
4 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 48 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.