HARD vs GDMN overlap
HARD and GDMN overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: HARD, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; GDMN, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | HARD | GDMN |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Street Group, LLC | $596K | $3.5M |
| Bluesphere Advisors LLC | $307K | $507K |
| Royal Bank of Canada | $1K | $210K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $8K | $76K |
| Global Retirement Partners, LLC | $53K | $2K |
| Morgan Stanley | $31 | $158 |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: HARD institutional holders, GDMN institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do HARD and GDMN overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for HARD as of June 30, 2026 and GDMN as of May 31, 2026.
Do institutions hold both HARD and GDMN?
6 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 60 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.