ETF Holders

GVIP vs CAML overlap

GVIP and CAML overlap 25.3% by weight, across 14 shared holdings.

GVIPCAML

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

25.3%
overlap by weight, across 14 shared holdings
GVIP27.7% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 50
CAML50.1% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 37

These funds report on different dates (GVIP: May 31, 2026, CAML: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

HoldingGVIPCAMLOverlap
ASML Holding-NYASML2.05%2.41%2.05%
Microsoft Corp.MSFT2.04%5.68%2.04%
Broadcom Inc.AVGO2.00%4.97%2.00%
Apple Inc.AAPL1.98%6.03%1.98%
META Platforms-aMETA1.96%2.47%1.96%
Amazon.COM Inc.AMZN1.95%2.68%1.95%
VISA Inc.-Class aV1.91%2.71%1.91%
ELI Lilly & CoLLY2.10%1.90%1.90%
Micron TechMU2.56%1.88%1.88%
Alphabet Inc.-aGOOGL1.83%6.00%1.83%
Nvidia Corp.NVDA1.79%7.62%1.79%
GE Vernova Inc.GEV1.76%3.57%1.76%
Tesla Inc.TSLA1.97%1.21%1.21%
Coherent Corp.COHR1.80%0.99%0.99%

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: GVIP, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; CAML, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.

Who owns them: GVIP institutional holders, CAML institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do GVIP and CAML overlap?

25.3% by weight, with 14 holdings in common, using holdings for GVIP as of May 31, 2026 and CAML as of July 31, 2026. The largest shared position is ASML.

Do institutions hold both GVIP and CAML?

7 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 84 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.