GSJY vs CNBS overlap
GSJY and CNBS overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: GSJY, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; CNBS, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | GSJY | CNBS |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Street Group, LLC | $4.0M | $595K |
| Citadel Advisors LLC | $1.5M | $548K |
| LPL Financial LLC | $423K | $731K |
| Integrated Wealth Concepts LLC | $145K | $408 |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $77K | $13K |
| UBS Group AG | $60K | $1K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: GSJY institutional holders, CNBS institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do GSJY and CNBS overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for GSJY as of May 31, 2026 and CNBS as of June 30, 2026.
Do institutions hold both GSJY and CNBS?
6 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 33 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.