GIND vs ECOW overlap

GIND and ECOW overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

GINDECOW

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

GIND0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 120

ECOW0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 100

These funds report on different dates (GIND: May 31, 2026, ECOW: July 31, 2026), so market moves and index changes between those dates lower the number. Funds tracking the same index can read well below their true overlap.

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: GIND, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; ECOW, SEC Form N-PORT, July 31, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 67 holding any

GIND2.4% of its 13F dollars, 16.7% of its 6 holders

ECOW0.6% of its 13F dollars, 1.6% of its 62 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	GIND	ECOW
Jane Street Group, LLC	$3.4M	$814K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: GIND institutional holders, ECOW institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do GIND and ECOW overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for GIND as of May 31, 2026 and ECOW as of July 31, 2026.

Do institutions hold both GIND and ECOW?

1 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 67 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.