GDMN vs BTCI overlap
GDMN and BTCI overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
Top shared holdings
These funds hold nothing in common.
Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: GDMN, SEC Form N-PORT, May 31, 2026; BTCI, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | GDMN | BTCI |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Street Group, LLC | $3.5M | $13.6M |
| Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc. | $2.3M | $880K |
| Susquehanna International Group, LLP | $2.5M | $333K |
| Kestra Advisory Services, LLC | $604K | $279K |
| Farther Finance Advisors, LLC | $89K | $529K |
| Allworth Financial LP | $68 | $231K |
| Royal Bank of Canada | $210K | $3K |
| Global Retirement Partners, LLC | $2K | $20K |
| Morgan Stanley | $158 | $3K |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: GDMN institutional holders, BTCI institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
How much do GDMN and BTCI overlap?
0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for GDMN as of May 31, 2026 and BTCI as of June 30, 2026.
Do institutions hold both GDMN and BTCI?
9 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 89 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.