FSGS vs BDVG overlap

FSGS and BDVG overlap 0.0% by weight, across 0 shared holdings.

FSGSBDVG

Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.

0.0%

overlap by weight, across 0 shared holdings

FSGS0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 100

BDVG0.0% of the fund is in shared holdings, of 39

Top shared holdings

These funds hold nothing in common.

Overlap by weight adds up the smaller weight of each holding the funds share, so 100% means identical portfolios. Long securities only: derivatives and cash vehicles are left out. Sources: FSGS, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026; BDVG, SEC Form N-PORT, June 30, 2026.

institutions report holding both, of 22 holding any

FSGS0.5% of its 13F dollars, 15.4% of its 13 holders

BDVG1.8% of its 13F dollars, 18.2% of its 11 holders

Largest institutions holding both

Firm	FSGS	BDVG
Osaic Holdings, Inc.	$61K	$169K
UBS Group AG	$727	$11K

This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.

Who owns them: FSGS institutional holders, BDVG institutional holders.

Frequently asked questions

How much do FSGS and BDVG overlap?

0.0% by weight, with 0 holdings in common, using holdings for FSGS as of June 30, 2026 and BDVG as of June 30, 2026.

Do institutions hold both FSGS and BDVG?

2 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 22 that report either one.

How is overlap by weight worked out?

For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.